Supreme Court affirms election of four governors

Must Read

As we wait for football’s return we remember those we have lost for ever – Brian Reade

The plan was for Leeds fans to remember Kevin Speight and Christopher Loftus at Elland Road before tomorrow’s Good Friday game...

Sadio Mane admits he was ‘thinking about Man Utd’ before Liverpool transfer

Sadio Mane has admitted he was "thinking more about Manchester United" before joining Liverpool in 2016. Mane has...

Bruno Fernandes explains Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s role in clinching Man Utd transfer

Bruno Fernandes has explained how Ole Gunnar Solskjaer convinced him to join Manchester United in a January transfer that proved...

Marcus Rashford details leading role Harry Maguire played in launch of NHS fund

Marcus Rashford has hailed the role played by Manchester United captain Harry Maguire in setting up the Players Together NHS fund....

The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the elections of governors of four states across the federation.

The governors are Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia State, Darius Ishaku of Taraba State, Ifeanyi Okowa of Delta State and Abubakar Bello of Niger State.

The seven-member panel of the Supreme Court in its series of hearings and judgments delivered within six hours reaffirmed verdicts earlier given at the lower court.

In all, the apex court’s decision saw the four incumbent governors emerging victorious over the various election petitions filed against them.


The Supreme Court affirmed the election of Mr Ikpeazu as Governor of Abia State.

Justice Paul Galinje, a member of the seven-member panel, who read the unanimous judgment, held that the appellant’s reliance solely on the smart card readers in proving the alleged over-voting was fatal to their case.

Mr Galinje also held that the law is clear that the petitioner must tender the voter’s register, and should relate the document to the specific area where the elections were affected.

According to Mr Galinje, the card reader print out tendered by the appellants at the tribunal is not part of the constitution or electoral act which determines the conditions for over-voting.

The judge said that the appellants failed to lead credible evidence in proving their case.

The candidate of the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA), Alex Otti, and his party had approached the apex court to set

aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal which upheld the election of Mr Ikpeazu.

They had in their appeal argued by their lawyer, Lateef Fagbemi,

asked the apex court to nullify the election of Mr Ikpeazu on grounds of over-voting and noncompliance with the electoral laws.

Mr Fagbemi in his argument urged the court to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the lower court and declare Mr Otti as the lawful winner of the March 9 governorship election in Abia State or in the alternative order a fresh election.

In their separate replies, the respondents urged the court to dismiss the appeal for lacking in merit.

The lawyer to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) adopted his brief of argument and urged the apex court to dismiss the appeal. The lawyer to Mr Ikpeazu and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Wole Olanipekun and Levy Uzoukwu, respectively told the court that the case of the appellants lacked merit because it was hinged on alleged over-voting occasioned by non-use of the card reader which the apex court has held cannot dethrone the manual accreditation of voters.

Delivering the judgment on Wednesday, Mr Galinje held that

the appeal lacked merit and accordingly dismissed it.

The Court of Appeal in Owerri, the Imo State capital,

headed by Justice R. A. Adah, had struck out the appeal filed by Mr Otti, and validated Mr Ikpeazu’s victory.

A three-member panel of the Governorship Election Petition Tribunal in Umuahia, the Abia State capital, chaired by A.L. Ogumoye, had also earlier dismissed the petition

The tribunal ruled that the petitioner failed to prove the case of over-voting and noncompliance to the INEC election guideline and the electoral act.

Mr Otti had asked the tribunal to cancel the results of elections in 15 out of the17 local government areas in Abia State.

He claimed that the respondents, PDP and Mr Ikpeazu, perpetrated excessive malpractice in those local governments.

Not satisfied with the tribunal judgment which threw out his

the petition, Mr Otti approached the appellate court asking it to quash the tribunal ruling and uphold the reliefs he (Otti) sought in court.


In a similar decision, the apex court also ruled against an appeal by Great Ogboru of the All Progressive Congress (APC) who had challenged the election of Governor Ifeanyi Okowa on grounds that the election was marred by vote-buying.

Respondents in the appeal are Mr Okowa, PDP and INEC.

Mr Ogboru and his party, APC, had sought to upturn the decision of the Delta State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal which affirmed Mr Okowa’s election for a second term as governor of Delta State. INEC had declared Okowa and PDP winner of the March 9 governorship election in Delta State.

Justice Centus Nweze who read the decision of the apex court on Wednesday affirmed the election Mr Okowa.

In his argument, Yunus Usman, who represented the appellants, argued that the votes claimed by Mr Okowa exceeded the total number of accredited voters for the March 9, 2019 governorship election.

According to him a total of 757,754 registered for the election in the state, while the final declared numbers at the end of the election were 955,274 votes.

However, Mr Okowa’s lawyer, Damian Dodo, urged the court to dismiss the appeal for being incompetent and unmeritorious.

Mr Damian said the appellants have failed to prove all their allegations both at the tribunal and at the court of appeal.

But dismissing the appeal on Wednesday, the seven-member panel led by Justice Nweze, unanimously held that the appellants, Mr Ogboru and the APC, failed to prove allegations of over-voting.

Mr Nweze said: “the appeal is a share waste of the precious time of the court.”


In the case of Taraba, the All Progressive Congress (APC) argued that the governor, Darius Ishaku, was not duly elected by a majority of lawful votes cast in the election.

The appellants also alleged noncompliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act (2010)

However, the lawyer who represented Mr Ishaku and the PDP, Kanu Agabi, urged the court to dismiss the APC’s appeal for being incompetent and lacking in merit.

Mr Agabi said the APC’s appeal has become academic following the withdrawal of their governorship candidate, Abubakar Danladi, from the petition, after his disqualification over false age declaration.

Responding to Mr Agabi’s submissions, the APC lawyer, Ishiaka Dikko, while admitting that the party’s candidate was disqualified from the election, said that the first runner up in the APC primaries ought to have been allowed to contest the election.

Mr Dikko urged the court to nullify Mr Ishiaku’s election and order a fresh election.

Delivering the judgment, the justices of the apex court all agreed that APC did not have a legal candidate at the election due to Mr Danladi’s disqualification.

One of the justices held that the APC’s argument that the runner up in the primaries be allowed to contest the election, was wrong because Sani Yahaya did not participate at any stage of the election. He said APC lacked the locus standi to file a petition in the first place at the tribunal.


The Supreme Court also affirmed the election of Abubakar Bello as the governor of Nover State.

The apex court while striking out the appeal filed

by Umar Nasco of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), held that it lacked merit.

In the unanimous judgment read by Justice Mary Odili, the court held that the Supreme Court will not tamper with the decisions of the Court of Appeal.

Mrs Odili held that the Court of Appeal was right in holding that the decision of the tribunal delivered outside the 180 days allowed by law was a nullity. She said that a judgment already declared a nullity by the appellate court cannot confer any benefit on the PDP candidate and any other party.

She, therefore, agreed that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and consequently struck it out for want of jurisdiction.

Mr Nasko had challenged the election of Governor Bello at the tribunal on the ground that he submitted forged documents and gave false information in his form CF001 submitted to INEC to secure clearance for the March 9, 2019 election.

However, the tribunal failed to deliver judgment in the petition within 180 days allowed by law, prompting the Appeal Court to declare the judgment of the tribunal a nullity, having been delivered outside the required period.


PT Mag Campaign AD

Source link



Latest Update

Looking back at the greatest shots in NBA Finals history

It's as unforgettable a moment as there is in NBA history, no matter how much San Antonio Spurs fans would love to forget...

Poland may extend restrictions, no drastic new rules planned: minister

FILE PHOTO: A worker wearing protective gear disinfects a public bus during the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Gdynia, Poland, April...

Where the Promise of Bernie Sanders Goes Now

The Bernie Sanders campaign was built on big promises. There was the promise of affordable health care, the promise of free college, the...

Jose Mourinho slammed by furious Sadiq Khan for holding Tottenham training session

Jose Mourinho has been slammed by London Mayor Sadiq Khan for holding a one-on-one training session with Tanguy Ndombele in a...

COVID-19: Enugu monarch hails Gov. Ugwuanyi, makes donations

A community leader from the proposed Ubogidi/Ozara autonomous community in Nsukka local government area, Enugu State, High Chief Asadu Samuel Ikechukwu has commended...

More Post Like This