US attorney general faces contempt vote over Mueller report

Must Read

Premier League clubs preparing for swap deal transfer market as big fees snubbed – John Cross

Premier League clubs are expecting an explosion in swap deals this summer. They are notoriously difficult transfers to complete because agreeing...

Arsenal ‘chasing’ latest wonderkid to follow in footsteps of Gabriel Martinelli

Arsenal have reportedly identified the latest wonderkid who they hope to develop into a first-team star. The Gunners have made...

Jesse Lingard drops hint over Man Utd future with candid admission

Jesse Lingard has dropped a hint his future still lies at Old Trafford despite rumours linking him with a move away...

Jurgen Klopp ‘calls Kalidou Koulibaly’ to lay out his plans ahead of transfer window

Jurgen Klopp has reportedly made contact with Napoli defender Kalidou Koulibaly over a move to Anfield this summer. The...


Image copyright
AFP/Getty Images

Image caption

Attorney General Bill Barr is facing a contempt vote in the House

Democrats in the US House of Representatives are about to vote on whether to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress.

The judiciary committee initiated the proceedings when Mr Barr refused to submit an unredacted version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

President Donald Trump has hit back by asserting executive privilege over the report, shielding it from public view.

The White House and Congress accused each other of abusing power.

Why is there a contempt vote?

The judiciary committee will vote on Wednesday on whether to recommend a contempt resolution against the attorney general for a full House vote.

Democratic lawmakers took action after Mr Barr did not comply with a subpoena to release the Mueller report minus the redactions.

The redacted 448-page Mueller report, released last month, did not determine there was a criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the president’s 2016 election campaign.

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

Chairman Nadler has criticised the Trump administration’s efforts to “stonewall Congress”

But it detailed 10 possible instances where Mr Trump allegedly attempted to impede the special counsel’s investigation.

Democrats say they need to see the full report and its underlying evidence to investigate possible obstruction of justice by Mr Trump.

House judiciary chairman Jerrold Nadler said the Trump administration’s refusal to provide the full Mueller report to Congress amounts to a “constitutional crisis”.

The New York Democrat said his party had “no choice” but to move forward with the contempt vote, “otherwise, we have a monarchy”.

But Doug Collins, a leading Republican on the committee, said on Wednesday the Department of Justice’s delay regarding the Mueller material was not unreasonable.

The Georgia lawmaker said Democrats were acting out of anger and fear, “without any valid legislative reason”.

  • Five looming fights between Congress and Trump
  • Eight new things in the Mueller report

What does the contempt vote mean?

For Mr Barr to actually face the prospect of charges, the entire House, which Democrats control by 235 lawmakers to 197 Republicans – would have to vote on the resolution.

The measure may be largely symbolic as it is seen as unlikely that the Department of Justice would actually indict America’s top law official with criminal contempt.

However, it would send a powerful message to the White House about congressional Democrats’ refusal to back down in an increasingly bitter showdown.

Mr Barr would be the first attorney general held in contempt of Congress since the Obama administration’s Eric Holder in 2012.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

President Trump has insisted the Mueller Report absolves him of any wrong-doing in his election campaign

How did the White House respond?

The White House accused Democrats of a “blatant abuse of power”.

Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said that, at the attorney general’s request, Mr Trump had blocked access to the full Mueller report through a “protective assertion of executive privilege”.

“Neither the White House nor Attorney General Barr will comply with Chairman Nadler’s unlawful and reckless demands,” she said in a statement.

She added: “They [Democrats] didn’t like the results of the report, and now they want a redo.”

The judiciary committee chairman argued that the White House was misapplying the doctrine of executive privilege.

Mr Nadler said: “This decision represents a clear escalation in the Trump administration’s blanket defiance of Congress’s constitutionally mandated duties.”

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Media captionThe Mueller report – in 60 seconds

What is executive privilege?

Executive privilege allows the president to keep certain materials private if disclosing them would disrupt the confidentiality of the Oval Office decision-making process.

The term itself is not mentioned in the US constitution, but many see it as an implied power of the presidency.

President Dwight Eisenhower first coined the phrase and it has been used since by both Republican and Democratic presidents.

During the Watergate investigation, President Richard Nixon tried to use executive privilege to block access to White House recordings – but the Supreme Court rejected the measure.

President Bill Clinton also invoked executive privilege during the Monica Lewinsky scandal to avoid having top aides testify, but a federal court ruled against him and the White House declined to push the matter to the Supreme Court.

Will Robert Mueller testify?

The House Judiciary Committee has formally requested Mr Mueller to testify, though a date has not yet been set.

The special counsel is still a Department of Justice employee, which means the attorney general could prevent him from testifying.

Mr Barr has previously said he would not mind Mr Mueller testifying before Congress. Mr Trump, however, has now called for the special counsel to not testify, tweeting: “No redos for the Dems!”

When Mr Mueller initially handed in his report, a spokesman said he would be leaving the department “within the coming days”.

If he does quit, he will become a private citizen and able to testify regardless of the department’s wishes.



Source link

Comments

0 comments

Latest Update

Hong Kong warns removing U.S. special status is a ‘double-edged sword’

HONG KONG (Reuters) - Hong Kong told the United States to keep out of the debate over national security legislation being imposed by...

Nationwide building society profits halve amid pandemic

Annual pre-tax profits fall to £466m as 280,000 customers take payment holidaysNationwide building society’s annual profits have almost halved, in part due to the...

Lessons Premier League can learn from Bundesliga’s return

Phase Two of the Premier League's Project Restart is underway - with players now "training as a group and engaging in...

More Post Like This

Comments

0 comments